DaVinci was no Darwinist

As it seems that not one person has submitted a sound argument on why Evolutionism is absolute truth for my contest, I think it would be appropriate to point out yet another reason why Darwin’s theory is wrong. Of course, this is not to dissuade all you dogmatic atheistic Evolutionists from submitting your amusing “proofs.”  Rather, it is to bring people to the light of undeniable truth.

Consider this: not one of the many geniuses throughout history (such as Plato, Aristotle, Thomas Aquinas, Leonardo DaVinci, etc.) developed the theory of Evolution until Darwin came along[1]. Why is it that none of these great minds came up with the same theory independently? Obviously, it is because they did not believe it. Issac Newton, who created the theory of gravity and invented calculus, was a Christian and did not believe in Evolution. It’s rather odd that Charles Darwin, a man with no other theories to his name, should come up with Darwinism instead of one of history’s great geniuses. It gets even more suspicious when you learn that this Darwin fellow considered himself to be an agnostic late in life. Perhaps Mr. Darwin created Darwinism to promote his Atheistic lifestyle.

But, before the publication of On the Origin of Species, there was another book that had been circulating for thousands of years that also claimed to know of the origin of species. This book was embraced by many of the great geniuses of Western society. You may have heard of it; it’s called The Bible. And unlike Darwin, who only has Darwinism to his name, the author of this book created the greatest thing of all; everything. Mull over that, Evolutionists, and then see if you can still make a valid argument for Darwin’s “great” theory.

Advertisements

~ by norealname on May 22, 2008.

6 Responses to “DaVinci was no Darwinist”

  1. You are arrogant and annoying, and using the idea that others didn’t come up with it first to prove its uselessness is the dumbest rebuke I have ever heard.
    Quit being the spokesperson for creation, because all you are doing is making giant claims with no evidence to back it up.

    This is no way to stand for the love and the truth of Christ.

  2. FYI

    ‘Agnostic’ does not equal ‘atheist’.

    ‘Agnostic’ asserts that it is impossible to imperically prove the existence of a deity – but does not speak to ‘belief’. An agnostic may choose to either belileve in a God (despite an admitted lack of proof), or an agnostic may believe there is no God(s) – which would make her/him an ‘anti-theist’, or such an agnostic may choose to DISBELIEVE anything on the subject of a deity (an atheist).

    As for the whole physics thingy…ever heard of Liebnitz??? QED

  3. “Living creatures arose from the moist element as it was evaporated by the sun. Man was like another animal, namely a fish, in the beginning.” – Anaximander (c. 610-546), Greek philosopher, journalist, and media personality. Proto-Darwinian of the Year in 561.

    If evolution isn’t true, then why does Baylor, Notre Dame, SMU, TCU, Stanford, Muhlenburg and every other CHRISTIAN college and university in the world with a science department teach evolution and common descent? Why can’t creationists sell their religious dogma as science to their own academic community? The burden of proof is not on “evolutionists” to back up the standing explanation for the diversity of life on Earth. The burden of proof is on anyone stupid enough to claim they don’t believe something in the 21rst century that was discovered in the 19th century.

  4. The competition in question is well known to be essentially fraudulent. Quite besides that questions range far outside of evolution, etc., the conditions essentially make it impossible to achieve, because the demands are (deliberately) ridiculous. Apparently even Answers in Genesis–a creationist website–objects to it.

    Just as one example, restricting myself to only the one question directly relevant to evolution per se (the last of the five). Its (deliberately?) worded to exclude the theory of evolution as its understood by scientists! It asks that one form of life be “changed to” another rather than “evolved from” or “descended from” another and that this be addressed… The “changed to” is a creationist re-working that has nothing to do with the theory of evolution. In essence, Hovind asked people to disprove a straw man version of the theory of evolution–one that isn’t the theory of evolution as its used.

    If you read all the thing carefully, you’ll see its intended to mislead those who don’t understand science (his creationist colleagues) into thinking its a “real” challenge. In practice the whole thing is a silly (if rather entertaining!) promotional stunt. Other creationists apparently think as much themselves.

    As for why earlier people didn’t have ideas that came later. Gee. Ideas tend to be “of their time”. And for good reasons. Ideas build upon previous understanding. Very obviously evolution can’t be founded without a wide and detailed understanding of life–as it really is–first…

    Certainly earlier people did entertain possibilities along the lines we now would call evolution, as Boris pointed out. But without the underlying knowledge/techniques/etc they couldn’t demonstrate it. (My namesake, Heraclides, did much the same, entertaining the thought that the earth orbited around the Sun a good while before it was demonstrated to be the case.)

    And, hey, while we’re on the subject. Christianity is an idea that came about at a certain time and not before too… Why didn’t the ancient Greeks think of it? Or the Babylonians? Or the Egyptians? Or countless others?

  5. All those ancient civilizations knew about Christianity, since they all descended from Adam. They just willfully chose to ignore the Truth.

  6. Creationist and Darwinists

    Can any body tell me? Who has made the perfect, mathematical and complex laws of Physics, laws of Chemistry and laws of biology , complex reproductive system in human and animal and plants ?. Scientists are only discovering these laws and in through obeying these law making some imperfect or semi perfect things. Yet the scientists have discovered a tiny part of the Creator’s innovative world. 99% yet to be explored. Keeping in view only a stupid or illogical persons can deny the perfect, and the wise Creator.

    The Darwin has proposed a theory not fact . His tautology could not be proved by any undoubtedly/real true scientific evidence/fact. After studying 10,000 fossils, Harun Yahya (click here to explore) a Turkish biologist has challenged all Darwinists of the world to produce a single intermediate fossil, he will pay US$100 billion . He has proved that every species appeared in perfect shape and disappeared and new specie appeared in perfect shape. No incomplete bird can survive and incomplete eye can see. A half build eye and half build wing cannot see and cannot fly.

    Survival of the fittest? Why love existence? Why a mother dies for her child?, Why A perfect family system of Honey bee functions?. Why Peacock beautiful colors appeared?. Darwinists have failed miserably to explain the facts of creation. So fact of existence of creator of a perfect, very beautiful and complex creation is just like Sun on the sky but blind cannot see.

    Click to watch video : Death of Darwinism and Win of Creationists

    Click to watch video : Fossil Record Prove Creationism

    Click to watch Video : Collapse to Ethism

    Click to Watch video : Disasters Darwinism Brought to Humanity

    Indeed Creation and ordering of the universe is seen as an act of prime mercy for which all creatures sing God’s glories and bear witness to God’s unity and lordship. According to the Islamic teachings, God exists without a place. According to the Qur’an, “No vision can grasp Him, but His grasp is over all vision. God is above all comprehension, yet is acquainted with all things” (Qur’an 6:103)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: