Attention Darwinists – Prove Evolution and Win Big
Back in his pre-federal prison days, the venerable creation scientist Dr. Kent Hovind made a wager that if any Darwinists could offer empirical scientific proof of Evolution, he would pay them $250,000. The fact that not a single Evolutionist has come forward and claimed the good doctor’s prize proves that the “theory” of Evolution is simply an atheistic religion masked as science. I mean, the terms of his wager are simple: prove beyond doubt that these five major tenets of Evolution happened without God:
- 1. Time, space, and matter came into existence by themselves.
- 2. Planets and stars formed from space dust.
- 3. Matter created life by itself.
- 4. Early life-forms learned to reproduce themselves.
- 5. Major changes occurred between these diverse life forms (i.e., fish changed to amphibians, amphibians changed to reptiles, and reptiles changed to birds or mammals).
A rather simple task if Darwinism were true and not simply an atheistic religion. Of course, some Godless “scientists” have claimed that the contest is nonsense, since only number five has anything to do with Evolution, the theory of Evolution has nothing to do with God, declaring something to be absolute truth is not scientific and the five criteria are unprovable. This is an obvious scientific smokescreen. Whenever someone challenges the rigid belief systems of Science, scientists always come out with various arguments on why they are wrong. It’s the oldest trick in the book.
Well, it’s time to disprove Darwin once and for all. I am offering $25,000,000,000,000,000 to any Darwinist can prove to me that Evolution (which is simply the Godless occurrence of the five points listed above) is undeniable truth. The evidence must be completely watertight and completely objective (i.e., no subjective sense organs can be used at any point in your scientific inquiry). Your proof must be submitted to me in a comment on this posting by July 1st, 2008 Anno Domini. If no Darwinists can provide rock solid evidence of Evolution by that date, the money will not be rewarded, Darwinism will be officially discredited and the King James Version of the Bible will universally be accepted as the inerrant word of God and, therefore, absolute truth.
Well, you Godless Darwinists, good luck in proving your dogmatic atheistic religion. You’re going to need some divine intervention to pull this off!
the epistles 
No one took Hovind up on his challenge because all he demonstrated was a complete lack of understanding of what science does on an extremely fundamental level, and you’re doing the same. Science does not prove things. Theories do not get proven, theory is top of the ladder, as high as it gets. A theory is an extremely well supported explanation of facts, as an explanation it is always open to modification or rejection should further evidence come along that contradicts it. In referring to past events (some of which don’t even *involve* evolution) Hovind was referring to the theory which is unprovable, just as the theory of gravity is unprovable. This does not change the fact that things fall when you drop them, and will still fall even if we find the theory of gravity to be completely wrong, because, like the theory of evolution, the theory of gravity is an explanation only and not a thing that can be proved, even in principle.
Hovind knew what he was doing, he knew that ignorant people would think he issued a legitimate challenge that no one could fulfill, while he knew that in actuality he was creating meaningless propaganda. You, on the other hand, seem to be one of those ignorant people who fell for it.
I really feel I’ve wasted my time in explaining that to you because I think you’re far too emotionally involved and ideologically set to even attempt to view things objectively. You don’t care about facts, you care about what supports your viewpoint.
Talk about arrogance, you believe you’ve already got all the answers don’t you? I thought only god was omnipotent? I thought you were supposed to be humble?
“Whenever someone challenges the rigid belief systems of Science, scientists always come out with various arguments on why they are wrong. It’s the oldest trick in the book.”
And what is it you’re doing right now, with this whole post?
We won’t even talk about the logical fallacy (false dichotomy if you’re curious) you’ve brought up by asserting that proving evolution wrong does *anything* for proving creationism right. You don’t prove one idea right by proving a completely different one wrong. Or the other fallacy (no sequiter) by asserting that proving creationism right does anything for proving the rest of the bible right.
Have fun believing a book which asserts the earth is held up by pillars contains the absolute and literal truth.
P.S. you would seem a lot more intelligent it you weren’t stuck on the absolutely asinine belief that evolution is atheistic. Perhaps you’re just not aware of the 50.000+ members of the American Association for the Advancement of Sciences who believe in a personal god AND support evolution, or the official position of the catholic church that evolution is gods mechanism through which he accomplished creation. I don’t blame you though, you’ve obviously just bought into the fundamentalist propaganda.
Honestly, your post is so idiotic that think it might be satire written by someone making fun of creationists. If that’s the case, then disregard everything I just said because you probably already know it.
Poe’s Law in action, I guess…
Jason you are absolutely incorrect on every one of your religious points. “Have fun believing a book which asserts the earth is held up by pillars contains the absolute and literal truth.” or this line “the official position of the catholic church that evolution is gods mechanism through which he accomplished creation.” Where did you come up with this noise? Don’t toot your own horn and then demonstrate your ignorance for someone elses beliefs. Take this next line to heart buddy:
You are not as smart as you think you are!
Go read your darwin bible some more and enjoy “your” pointless time here on this wonderful planet.
Hmmmm….
I think your money has been won – though not by me! Rather, by THIS guy: http://motls.blogspot.com/
Just read about 3 months worth of his posts, going back, and you will find your points have been proven – though, not aware of your challenge, this dude has not consolidated the info… Yet, he is one of (if not THE) world’s leading theoretical physicists, and his posts really DO answer all your points.
I just hope you have the cash!
Ah, but he used sense organs to ascertain that there is, in fact, a universe. Without complete objectivity I cannot award the prize.
when
yeah
when are the evolutionists going to wake up? ever heard of complex organisms that can’t be explained by numerous small changes in DNA?
I know I haven’t.
Evolution is as valid as a Karl Benz driver’s license.
LoL I Should get the $$ for this:
http://english.pravda.ru/photo/report/mutant-3050/1/
Think about it: “If animals adapt to their surrounding, they sure would spend more time than any other animal with humans”
Just give it some thought…
I mean if i showed up at this guys doorstep with that i’d expect him to agree on the terms that he pay me full boat if I provide the funds necessary to get this claim legitimately “evaluated”
This article is absurd. The wager is clearly made by someone who was scientifically illiterate. Evolution is undeniable. And biological evolution makes no assertions about stars or the big bang. The are no missing links and in fact every living organism on this planet is genetically similar. Nucleic Acids ARE self replicating polypeptides. Your cells powerhouse (mitochondria) actually originated as a prokaryotic cell and only after bulb of years of gradually increasing complexity did it find use in a eukarotic cell. Which in means your body uses bacteria to power it. This is why America is falling behind, scientific illiteracy!!